Post#27 » Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:42 pm
It is expected that there will be a number of XKs that will not be able to make the change over to a new game. Thus leaving us with the dilemma of choosing between a brand new game or a slightly older game based upon the number of XKs with systems that can handle it. What it comes down to is a risk assessment. The question is, does the risk of having fewer XKs being able to play the newer game out weight the benefits that may come by choosing a newer game?
I think that it does. As much as I hate to think of this decision in this way, we really are choosing an avenue that will provide XK with the chance at the most new members. The primary objective is to inject new life into XK via new members while all others, such as enjoyment that we may get and how many XKs we can have in-game on day one, are secondary.
In following the above rational, I believe that BC2 is the best option. Even with fewer XKs in game, the fact that BC2 has dedicated servers provides a huge advantage for us over MW2. Dedis allow us, as individuals, to play in a server with the same people over and over again. Someone sees you enough in a server and they befriend you. Thus a potential prospect has been gained (similar to a process we use in Halo). You simply cannot do this in MW2 where teams change constantly. Unless you befriend someone in that one game, your chances of seeing them again drastically decrease with each passing moment.
What game will provide XK with the highest probability of bringing in more members and thus extending it's life? That is the primary issue we should be discussing here.