[XK] Clan

http://files.filefront.com/temp2wmv/;11 ... einfo.html

Old news but if anyone still talks to this sad recluse link him to this.

who cares

We know he bots. We know he's not changing. We know he'd be the 1st person to use a bot in a new version. One day he'll learn the hard way that cheating in a 5 year old game won't get him far in life.

Just don't scrim vs him.

haha, sad recluse indeed

wow 08 botter and its only been a WEEK since the update.

Yeah it took quite a while eh Rupture? lol fuck that temp clown

Another paki fail. Someone give this guy some purpose in life.

cause his ugly ass is to fat and lazy to actually LEARN how to play the game?

1) how're 100% certain its 1.08
2) its REALLLY easy to port the aimbot to ANY version of halo.... u guys want one for 1.04? or 1.08?

{RU}Toyota wrote:u guys want one for 1.04? or 1.08?

ha clever I see what your trying to do there. I will not self-incriminate!

ill add the clickbot in too, for free! if u call within the next 20 mins

{RU}Toyota wrote:ill add the clickbot in too, for free! if u call within the next 20 mins

get away you corrupt parasite

we dont want any of your corrupt hax!

XK·FD~Nazi` wrote:

{RU}Toyota wrote:ill add the clickbot in too, for free! if u call within the next 20 mins

get away you corrupt parasite

we dont want any of your corrupt hax!

o.o am i corrupt or are my hax corrupt?

Well... to put it this way... it has everything to do with syntatic features...

per say..

With this clarification, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not subject to a descriptive fact. For one thing, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not to be considered in determining nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Clearly, the systematic use of complex symbols cannot be arbitrary in an abstract underlying order. To characterize a linguistic level L, the descriptive power of the base component delimits an important distinction in language use.


In shorts... hax fail.
And so, i dub this... DUBBED!

{xk}`Brink wrote:Well... to put it this way... it has everything to do with syntatic features...

per say..

With this clarification, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not subject to a descriptive fact. For one thing, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not to be considered in determining nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Clearly, the systematic use of complex symbols cannot be arbitrary in an abstract underlying order. To characterize a linguistic level L, the descriptive power of the base component delimits an important distinction in language use.


In shorts... hax fail.
And so, i dub this... DUBBED!

MY GAWD

{xk}`Brink wrote:Well... to put it this way... it has everything to do with syntatic features...

per say..

With this clarification, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not subject to a descriptive fact. For one thing, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not to be considered in determining nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Clearly, the systematic use of complex symbols cannot be arbitrary in an abstract underlying order. To characterize a linguistic level L, the descriptive power of the base component delimits an important distinction in language use.


In shorts... hax fail.
And so, i dub this... DUBBED!

somebody needs to see the psychiatrist