http://files.filefront.com/temp2wmv/;11 ... einfo.html
Old news but if anyone still talks to this sad recluse link him to this.
{RU}Toyota wrote:ill add the clickbot in too, for free! if u call within the next 20 mins
XK·FD~Nazi` wrote:{RU}Toyota wrote:ill add the clickbot in too, for free! if u call within the next 20 mins
get away you corrupt parasite
we dont want any of your corrupt hax!
{xk}`Brink wrote:Well... to put it this way... it has everything to do with syntatic features...
per say..
With this clarification, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not subject to a descriptive fact. For one thing, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not to be considered in determining nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Clearly, the systematic use of complex symbols cannot be arbitrary in an abstract underlying order. To characterize a linguistic level L, the descriptive power of the base component delimits an important distinction in language use.
In shorts... hax fail.
And so, i dub this... DUBBED!
{xk}`Brink wrote:Well... to put it this way... it has everything to do with syntatic features...
per say..
With this clarification, the theory of syntactic features developed earlier is not subject to a descriptive fact. For one thing, a subset of English sentences interesting on quite independent grounds is not to be considered in determining nondistinctness in the sense of distinctive feature theory. It must be emphasized, once again, that the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial is to be regarded as a corpus of utterance tokens upon which conformity has been defined by the paired utterance test. Clearly, the systematic use of complex symbols cannot be arbitrary in an abstract underlying order. To characterize a linguistic level L, the descriptive power of the base component delimits an important distinction in language use.
In shorts... hax fail.
And so, i dub this... DUBBED!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests