FPS (Frames per second)

`K!`TT´¥ · Post #61 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:21 pm

lol now push alt + f4 for an aimbot :twisted:

Post #62 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:32 pm

[XK]`K!`TTÂ´Â¥Â´ wrote:lol now push alt + f4 for an aimbot

{xk}`TÃ¸meâ€” wrote:Omega, you're a bit late in the game

I hate you all! :cry:

`K!`TT´¥ · Post #63 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:38 pm

^^ don't hate, appreciate!!

shankedup · Post #64 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:11 pm

thats too cheerleader-ish

try this:

dont get mad, get glad

Post #65 » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:10 pm

H·Gød · Post #66 » Thu Feb 28, 2008 1:06 pm

I was also susprised at how much more shots hit once you gain more fps. It really helps, I would recommend this to anyone.

d4rki3` · Post #67 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:49 am

[XK]Mistake wrote:You can't compete with 10 or less.

well i play with 7-11fps, and I found it that you can't compete, but you gotta record snice there are some many botters. even if that does mean you suck ass :roll:

Authen7iC~ · Post #68 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 5:58 am

! JoSe wrote:
[XK]Mistake wrote:You can't compete with 10 or less.

well i play with 7-11fps, and I found it that you can't compete, but you gotta record snice there are some many botters. even if that does mean you suck ass

7 fps is litterally unplayable, i really doubt you get that. Try -useff and make sure in ur video settings its at 640x480 specular shadows decals OFF. particles off and textures on medium.

The minimum fps a person can play decently with is about 15+ anything under that and it will just look like a slideshow

d4rki3` · Post #69 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 11:16 am

Authen7iC~ wrote:
! JoSe wrote:
[XK]Mistake wrote:You can't compete with 10 or less.

well i play with 7-11fps, and I found it that you can't compete, but you gotta record snice there are some many botters. even if that does mean you suck ass

7 fps is litterally unplayable, i really doubt you get that. Try -useff and make sure in ur video settings its at 640x480 specular shadows decals OFF. particles off and textures on medium.

The minimum fps a person can play decently with is about 15+ anything under that and it will just look like a slideshow

Well, I do, and it's because I have a bad Intel (R)integrated chip, and 256 RAM, -useff none of that helps me, I got videos of me playing with 4-8 fps...

scene · Post #70 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 1:07 pm

i play on exactly what you said, everything on low or off, and i still get a solid 25-30 fps. But thats prolly just cus my comp succs

Post #71 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:06 pm

400fps is hard too

dumb quad core

dumb 8800

scene · Post #72 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 2:09 pm

[XK]Mistake wrote:400fps is hard too

dumb quad core

dumb 8800

dumb pentium 3, 795mhz
dumb 320mb ram
dumb 30gb hardrive
dumb dumb dumb

Post #73 » Sun Jun 01, 2008 10:35 pm

[XK]ÂºÂ§Â¢3Ã±3Âº wrote:
[XK]Mistake wrote:400fps is hard too

dumb quad core

dumb 8800

dumb pentium 3, 795mhz
dumb 320mb ram
dumb 30gb hardrive
dumb dumb dumb

scene how do u record with that then? Ur vids don't seem that bad as far as quality and fps go

Post #74 » Mon Jun 02, 2008 4:21 am

Well for one 3.7 is a pretty high clock so that helps him plus he didnt say the gfx card he has. But yeah 30 fps for that sounds about right. I had a stupid celeron for a while :/. Also where the fuck did u find 320mb of ram lol...never seen that b4.

Post #75 » Mon Jun 02, 2008 7:35 am

256+64=320.

You're all about to be sat down.

733Mhz G4
GeForce MX400 32MB
384MB RAM

stfu

[XK] Clan